4.6 Article

Automatic Feature Learning to Grade Nuclear Cataracts Based on Deep Learning

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 62, Issue 11, Pages 2693-2701

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2444389

Keywords

Automatic feature learning; cataract grading; deep learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Goal: Cataracts are a clouding of the lens and the leading cause of blindness worldwide. Assessing the presence and severity of cataracts is essential for diagnosis and progression monitoring, as well as to facilitate clinical research and management of the disease. Methods: Existing automatic methods for cataract grading utilize a predefined set of image features that may provide an incomplete, redundant, or even noisy representation. In this study, we propose a system to automatically learn features for grading the severity of nuclear cataracts from slit-lamp images. Local filters are first acquired through clustering of image patches from lenses within the same grading class. The learned filters are fed into a convolutional neural network, followed by a set of recursive neural networks, to further extract higher order features. With these features, support vector regression is applied to determine the cataract grade. Results: The proposed system is validated on a large population-based dataset of 5378 images, where it outperforms the state of the art by yielding with respect to clinical grading a mean absolute error (epsilon) of 0.304, a 70.7% exact integral agreement ratio (R-0), an 88.4% decimal grading error <= 0.5 (R-e0.5), and a 99.0% decimal grading error <= 1.0 (R-e1.0). Significance: The proposed method is useful for assisting and improving clinical management of the disease in the context of large-population screening and has the potential to be applied to other eye diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available