4.4 Article

Nutrient Solution Concentration Affects Growth, Mineral Composition, Phenolic Acids, and Flavonoids in Leaves of Artichoke and Cardoon

Journal

HORTSCIENCE
Volume 47, Issue 10, Pages 1424-1429

Publisher

AMER SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.47.10.1424

Keywords

biomass production; caffeoylquinic acids; Cynara cardunculus; macrominerals; phytochemicals

Categories

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Policies (MiPAAF) [29627/7818/10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A greenhouse experiment was conducted in Summer and Fall 2011 at the experimental farm of Tuscia University, central Italy, to study the effect of nutrient solution concentration (4, 20, 36, 52, or 68 mequiv.L-1) on biomass production, mineral composition, and concentrations of the major polyphenols in 'Romolo' artichoke and 'Bianco Avorio' cardoon grown in a floating system. Leaf dry biomass, leaf number, and macroelement concentrations (nitrogen, potassium, calcium, and magnesium) of artichoke and cardoon increased in response to an increase in the nutrient solution concentration, whereas an opposite trend was observed for the total polyphenols, phenolic acids (chlorogenic acid, cynarin, and caffeic acid), and the flavonoid luteolin. Artichoke and cardoon gave maximum biomass production and leaf number at 45 and 54 mequiv.L-1, respectively. Cardoon showed higher biomass and leaf number (average 1.13 kg.m(-2) and 14.0 n./plant, respectively) than those observed in artichoke (average 1.07 kg.m(-2) and 12.7 n./plant, respectively). The chlorogenic acid, cynarin, caffeic acid, and luteolin concentrations were higher by 204%, 462%, 580%, and 445% in cardoon leaf tissue than in that of artichoke. An improvement of leaf quality (total polyphenols, phenolic acids, and flavonoids) was obtained at the expense of leaf yield through the use of lower fertilizer concentrations in the nutrient solution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available