4.6 Article

Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Mammographic Masses Using Scalable Image Retrieval

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages 783-792

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2365494

Keywords

Breast masses; computer-aided diagnosis (CAD); content-based image retrieval (CBIR); mammography

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF-MRI-1229628]
  2. Oak Ridge Associated Universities
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61301269]
  4. Sichuan Provincial Key Technology Research and Development Program [2014GZX0009]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M552339]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Computer-aided diagnosis of masses in mammograms is important to the prevention of breast cancer. Many approaches tackle this problem through content-based image retrieval techniques. However, most of them fall short of scalability in the retrieval stage, and their diagnostic accuracy is, therefore, restricted. To overcome this drawback, we propose a scalable method for retrieval and diagnosis of mammographic masses. Specifically, for a query mammographic region of interest (ROI), scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) features are extracted and searched in a vocabulary tree, which stores all the quantized features of previously diagnosed mammographic ROIs. In addition, to fully exert the discriminative power of SIFT features, contextual information in the vocabulary tree is employed to refine the weights of tree nodes. The retrieved ROIs are then used to determine whether the query ROI contains a mass. The presented method has excellent scalability due to the low spatial-temporal cost of vocabulary tree. Extensive experiments are conducted on a large dataset of 11 553 ROIs extracted from the digital database for screening mammography, which demonstrate the accuracy and scalability of our approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available