4.4 Review

Misresponse to Reversed and Negated Items in Surveys: A Review

Journal

JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages 737-747

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1509/jmr.11.0368

Keywords

survey methods; Likert items; reversed items; negations; misresponse; method effects

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are important advantages to including reversed items in questionnaires (e.g., control of acquiescence, disruption of nonsubstantive responding, better coverage of the domain of content of a construct), but reversed items can also lead to measurement problems (e.g., low measure reliability, complex factor structures). The authors advocate the continued use of reversed items in measurement instruments but also argue that they should be used with caution. To help researchers improve their scale construction practices, the authors provide a comprehensive review of the literature on reversed and negated items and offer recommendations about their use in questionnaires. The theoretical discussion is supplemented with data on 1330 items from measurement scales that have appeared in Journal of Marketing Research and Journal of Consumer Research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available