4.6 Article

Virological Analysis in Patients with Human Herpes Virus 6-Associated Ocular Inflammatory Disorders

Journal

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
Volume 53, Issue 8, Pages 4692-4698

Publisher

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-10095

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE. To determine whether human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6) genomic DNA and mRNA can be detected in ocular samples from patients with inflammatory disorders, and whether viral replication is involved in the development of inflammation in the eye. METHODS. After informed consent was obtained, ocular fluid samples (aqueous humor and vitreous fluids) were collected from 350 patients with uveitis or endophthalmitis. Corneal samples were also collected from 65 patients with corneal infections. Multiplex PCR was performed to screen ocular samples from the patients for HHV-1 to HHV-8. Samples were also assayed for HHV-6 DNA using quantitative real-time PCR. Primers for nested RT-PCR were designed to detect amplification of mRNA (HHV-6 A IE1 U90). RESULTS. PCR results indicated a total of seven patients with uveitis or endophthalmitis (7/350, 2% +) and a single patient with corneal inflammatory disease were positive for HHV-6 DNA (1/65, 1.5% +). These eight patients had high copy numbers of HHV-6 DNA, with values ranging from 4.03103 to 5.13106 copies/mL. Real-time PCR analysis indicated that two of these cases were HHV-6 variant A and six cases were variant B. In addition, HHV-6 mRNA was clearly detected in vitreous cells collected from one of the patients, suggesting that viral replication may occur in the eye. CONCLUSIONS. Our results indicate that HHV-6 infection/reactivation is implicated in ocular inflammatory diseases. (www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index/htm number, R000002708.) (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53:4692-4698) DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-10095

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available