4.5 Article

Hyperthermic treatment at 56 °C induces tumour-specific immune protection in a mouse model of prostate cancer in both prophylactic and therapeutic immunization regimens

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 36, Issue 25, Pages 3708-3716

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.010

Keywords

Hyperthermia; Dendritic cells vaccines; Docetaxel; Prostate carcinoma

Funding

  1. Fondazione CARIVERONA
  2. Fondazione CRT
  3. AIRC/FIRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most active cancer immunotherapies able to induce a long-lasting protection against tumours are based on the activation of tumour-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). Cell death by hyperthermia induces apoptosis followed by secondary necrosis, with the production of factors named danger associated molecular pattern (DAMP) molecules (DAMPs), that activate dendritic cells (DCs) to perform antigen uptake, processing and presentation, followed by CTLs cross priming. In many published studies, hyperthermia treatment of tumour cells is performed at 42-45 degrees C; these temperatures mainly promote cell surface expression of DAMPs. Treatment at 56 degrees C of tumour cells was shown to induce DAMPs secretion rather than their cell surface expression, improving DC activation and CTL cross priming in vitro. Thus we tested the relevance of this finding in vivo on the generation of a tumour-specific memory immune response, in the TRAMP-C2 mouse prostate carcinoma transplantable model. TRAMP-C2 tumour cells treated at 56 degrees C were able not only to activate DCs in vitro but also to trigger a tumour-specific CTLdependent immune response in vivo. Prophylactic vaccination with 56 C-treated TRAMP-C2 tumour cells alone provided protection against TRAMP-C2 tumour growth in vivo, whilst in the therapeutic regimen, control of tumour growth was achieved combining immunization with adjuvant chemotherapy. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available