4.7 Article

Effect of the main process parameters on the mechanical strength of polyphenylsulfone (PPSU) in ultrasonic micro-moulding process

Journal

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages 46-58

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.03.024

Keywords

Ultrasonic micro-moulding; Ultrasound technology; Polyphenylsulfone; PPSU; Amplitude; Velocity; Degradation; FTIR; DSC

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [DPI2013-45201-P]
  2. University of Girona (Spain) [MPCUdG2016/036]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultrasonic micro-moulding technology was used to process high performance polymer polyphenylsulfone (PPSU) due to investigate mechanical and chemical characteristics of manufacturing parts. Both the processing window and dependence between the main input parameters, in this case amplitude, plunger velocity and ultrasonic exposure time and their influence on the mechanical properties were appointed. The experiments showed that each available amplitude level (58 mu m, 52.2 m, 46.4 mu m, 40.6 mu m) are suitable to produce specimens characterised by high mechanical strength but only when combined with the appropriate values of the rest of the parameters. The parameter, which influenced the most on the part degradation is the ultrasonic vibration time. Samples from the combination of parameters, where the amplitude and velocity had the highest value but time of sonication is one of the lowest are less exposed for degradation. Cavitation bubbles makes polymer falling apart which decreases mechanical strength of the manufacturing parts. Degradation was observed via FTIR analysis even if it was not visually visible. Finally, the model as a tool for selecting the appropriate values for the input process parameters when using the novel ultrasonic micro-moulding technology required to produce PPSU parts characterised by their high mechanical strength was developed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available