4.7 Article

Influence of surface roughness on the measurement of acoustic nonlinearity parameter of solids using contact piezoelectric transducers

Journal

ULTRASONICS
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages 112-118

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.10.022

Keywords

Acoustic nonlinearity parameter; Surface roughness; Transducer calibration

Funding

  1. Industry/University Cooperative Research Program of the Center for Nondestructive Evaluation at Iowa State University, United States

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current article reports on the experimental study of the influence of surface roughness on the measurement of the acoustic nonlinearity parameter. The nonlinearity parameter was measured using contact piezoelectric transducers, which were calibrated using the reciprocity based technique. Aluminum and steel samples were chosen to study the influence of hardness of the sample on the measurement of the nonlinearity parameter. While, lower Ra value (average asperity height) aluminum samples were more susceptible to surface deformation and scratches from coupling the transducer to the sample, the same could not be observed for steel samples. Results demonstrate a large variation in nonlinearity parameter for aluminum (similar to 35%) compared to steel (similar to 2%) between two consecutive experiments, suggesting flattening of asperities after the first experiment. Experiments were also performed with 3 different setup configurations; (1) receiver and transmitter on rough sides, (2) receiver on smooth and transmitter on rough side and (3) receiver on rough and transmitter on smooth side. Results show that least variation in the measured nonlinearity parameter was observed when the receiver was placed on the smooth side, and a 10% variation was observed between the three setup configurations. Finally, a comparison of relative nonlinearity parameter calculated using current or voltage ratio and absolute nonlinearity parameter showed large discrepancies. Conclusions were drawn from the experimental observations. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available