4.7 Article

Stochastic modeling of breakdown at freeway merge bottleneck and traffic control method using connected automated vehicle

Journal

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL
Volume 107, Issue -, Pages 146-166

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2017.11.007

Keywords

Traffic breakdown; Bottleneck; Stochastic capacity; Traffic control strategy; Connected automated vehicle; Bayesian inference method

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI 1439795, 1536599]
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1536599, 1439795] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a novel breakdown probability model based on microscopic driver behavior for a freeway merge bottleneck. Extending Newell's car following model to describe the transition from free-flow to congested regimes, two elements of breakdown, trigger and propagation, are derived in terms of vehicle headway. Combining these elements, a general breakdown probability is derived in terms of various parameters related to driver behavior and traffic conditions - other than flow - that can be treated as constants or stochastic with probability distributions. The proposed model is validated with real data. It was found that the theoretical breakdown probability distribution accords well with the empirical counterpart within reasonable ranges of parameter values. Our model suggests that the breakdown probability (i) increases with flow (both mainline and merging) as expected, and the merging spacing, (ii) decreases with the merging speed and aggressive driver characteristics, and interestingly, (iii) increases with the deviation in headway. A proactive traffic control method to achieve uniform headway is developed considering low penetration rates of connected automated vehicle technologies. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available