4.4 Article

Passive Boundary Layer Flow Control Using Porous Lamination

Journal

TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages 533-551

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-018-1083-5

Keywords

Boundary layer; Porous lamination; Passive flow control; Slip velocity

Funding

  1. Aeronautical Research and Development Board (AR&DB), DRDO, Government of India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The flow over a porous laminated flat plate is investigated from a flow control perspective through experiments and computations. A square array of circular cylinders is used to model the porous lamination. We determine the velocities at the fluid-porous interface by solving the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes and the continuity equations using a staggered flow solver and using LDV in experiments. The control parameters for the porous region are porosity, and Reynolds number, Re, based on the diameter of the circular cylinders used to model the porous lamination. Computations are conducted for and , and the experiments are conducted for and 0.8 at and 803. The permeability of the porous lamination is observed to induce a slip velocity at the interface, effectively making it a slip wall. The slip velocity is seen to be increasing functions of and Re. For higher porosities at higher Re, the slip velocity shows non-uniform and unsteady behavior and a breakdown Reynolds number is defined based on this characteristic. A map demarcating the two regimes of flow is drawn from the computational and experimental data. We observe that the boundary layer over the porous lamination is thinner than the Blasius boundary layer and the shear stress is higher at locations over the porous lamination. We note that the porous lamination helps maintain a favorable pressure gradient at the interface which delays separation. The suitable range of porosities for effective passive separation control is deduced from the results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available