4.5 Article

Assessment of cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of exfoliated graphene

Journal

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
Volume 52, Issue -, Pages 195-202

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2018.06.016

Keywords

Exfoliated graphene; Macrophages; Mutagenicity; Gene expression profiles; Nanomaterials

Categories

Funding

  1. project Innovative carbon nanotubes composite materials project toward achieving a low carbon society [P10024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphene and related materials (GRMs) have unique optical and thermal characteristics and are expected to be adopted for industrial applications. However, there are concerns with respect to their safety to human health. To conduct cytotoxicity and mutagenicity assessments, exfoliated graphene (EGr) dispersed in Tween-20 (R) was diluted in cell culture medium. Rat alveolar macrophage viability significantly decreased after 24 h exposure to 1 and 10 mu g/mL EGr. No significant levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species were detected in the 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescin diacetate assay after 24 h of exposure to EGr. The levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha, interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-18, macrophage chemoattractant protein-1, and tumor necrosis factor a were significantly higher in cells treated with 10 mu g/mL EGr for 24 h than in untreated controls. Transmission electron microscopy confirmed that EGr was present in the cytoplasm of the cells. Many genes were upregulated by EGr treatment, and significantly overrepresented gene ontology categories included the biological processes response to external stimulus, response to stress, cell-cell signaling, biological adhesion, and cell proliferation. EGr did not induce genetic mutations in E. coli or cause micronucleus induction in mouse bone marrow cells. The results suggest that EGr cytotoxicity should be carefully considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available