4.5 Article

Experimental challenges regarding the in vitro investigation of the nanoparticle-biocorona in disease states

Journal

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages 40-49

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2018.05.003

Keywords

Dosimetry modeling; Low density lipoprotein; Macrophage; Tumor necrosis factor alpha; Scavenger receptors; Iron oxide

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [R00 ES 024392]
  2. K-State Mentoring Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Toxicological evaluation of nanoparticles (NPs) requires the utilization of in vitro techniques due to their number and diverse properties. Cell culture systems are often lacking in their ability to perform comparative toxicity assessment due to dosimetry issues and capacity to simulate in vivo environments. Upon encountering a physiological environment, NPs become coated with biomolecules forming a biocorona (BC), influencing function, biodistribution, and toxicity. Disease-induced alterations in the biological milieu can alter BC formation. This study evaluates the role of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in altering macrophage responses to iron oxide (Fe3O4) NPs. BCs were formed by incubating Fe3O4 NPs in serum-free media, or 10% fetal bovine serum with or without LDL present. Following exposures to a normalized dose (25 mu g/mL), macrophage association of Fe3O4 NPs with a LDL-BC was enhanced. TNF-alpha mRNA expression and protein levels were differentially induced due to BCs. Cell surface expression of SR-B1 was reduced following all Fe3O4 NPs exposures, while only NPs with an LDL-BC enhanced mitochondrial membrane potential. These findings suggest that elevations in LDL may contribute to distinct BC formation thereby influencing NP-cellular interactions and response. Further, our study highlights challenges that may arise during the in vitro evaluation of disease-related variations in the NP-BC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available