4.7 Article

Repairing chronic myocardial infarction with autologous mesenchymal stem cells engineered tissue in rat promotes angiogenesis and limits ventricular remodeling

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1423-0127-19-93

Keywords

Chronic myocardial infarction; Tissue engineering; Mesenchymal stem cell; Ventriculoplasty

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Tissue engineering scaffold constitutes a new strategy of myocardial repair. Here, we studied the contribution of a patch using autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) seeded on collagen-1 scaffold on the cardiac reconstruction in rat model of chronic myocardial infarction (MI). Methods: Patches were cultured with controlled MSCs (growth, phenotype and potentiality). Twenty coronary ligated rats with tomoscingraphy (SPECT)-authenticated transmural chronic MI were referred into a control group (n = 10) and a treated group (n = 10) which beneficiated an epicardial MSC-patch engraftment. Contribution of MSC-patch was tested 1-mo after using non-invasive SPECT cardiac imaging, invasive hemodynamic assessment and immunohistochemistry. Results: 3D-collagen environment affected the cell growth but not the cell phenotype and potentiality. MSC-patch integrates well the epicardial side of chronic MI scar. In treated rats, one-month SPECT data have documented an improvement of perfusion in MI segments compared to control (64 +/- 4% vs 49 +/- 3% p = 0.02) and a reduced infarction. Contractile parameter dp/dtmax and dp/dtmin were improved (p < 0.01). Histology showed an increase of ventricular wall thickness (1.75 +/- 0.24 vs 1.35 +/- 0.32 mm, p < 0.05) and immunochemistry of the repaired tissue displayed enhanced angiogenesis and myofibroblast-like tissue. Conclusion: 3D-MSC-collagen epicardial patch engraftment contributes to reverse remodeling of chronic MI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available