4.7 Article

A fracture criterion for fracture simulation of ductile metals based on micro-mechanisms

Journal

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED FRACTURE MECHANICS
Volume 95, Issue -, Pages 127-142

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.02.005

Keywords

Fracture criterion; Shear fracture; Micro-mechanisms; Experiments; Numerical simulations

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51678432]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A correct representation of the fracture limit for material subject to various stress states is essential for the accurate prediction of fracture behavior. In this paper, a comprehensive fracture criterion for ductile metals is developed. The proposed criterion is composed of two competing and correlated sub-criterions corresponding to the stress states where the shear fracture and tensile fracture modes can be captured. Especially, a new shear fracture criterion is developed based on microscopic studies on the void nucleation and evolution behavior. According to this criterion, fracture in low positive and negative triaxiality regime is triaxiality sensitive and Lode parameter dependent. The tension fracture criterion is derived from the Rice and Tracey void growth equation, thus it predicts the ductility loss due to stress triaxiality in an exponential function. The overall fracture criterion has five free parameters including the strain hardening exponent, and is proved to be capable of predicting fracture correctly in almost all types of specimen tests in the literatures. A calibration strategy by using four specimen tests is proposed, and specimen tests are performed to calibrate and validate the fracture criterion for Q345 steel. Numerical simulation of the tests are performed, and the experimental and numerical results agree well, which validates the proposed fracture criterion and shows its application in fractures modelling of large-scale engineering problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available