4.5 Article

Inference for Errors-in-Variables Models in the Presence of Systematic Errors with an Application to a Satellite Remote Sensing Campaign

Journal

TECHNOMETRICS
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages 187-201

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00401706.2018.1476268

Keywords

Estimating equations; OCO-2; Regression analysis; Scaling bias; Systematic error; TCCON

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Discovery Project [DP150104576]
  2. NASA [NNH11-ZDA001N-OCO2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivated by a satellite remote sensing mission, this article proposes a multivariable errors-in-variables (EIV) regression model with heteroscedastic errors for relating the satellite data products to similar products from a well-characterized but globally sparse ground-based dataset. In the remote sensing setting, the regression model is used to estimate the global divisor for the satellite data. The error structure of the proposed EIV model comprises two components: A random-error component whose variance is inversely proportional to sample size of underlying individual observations which are aggregated to obtain the regression data, and a systematic-error component whose variance remains the same as the underlying sample size increases. In this article, we discuss parameter identifiability for the proposed model and obtain estimates from two-stage parameter estimation. We illustrate our proposed procedure through both simulation studies and an application to validating measurements of atmospheric column-averaged CO2 from NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite. The validation uses coincident target-mode OCO-2 data that are temporally and spatially sparse and ground-based measurements from the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) that are spatially sparse but more accurate. Supplementary materials for the article are available online.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available