4.7 Article

Study of silica-structured materials as sorbents for organophosphorus pesticides determination in environmental water samples

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 189, Issue -, Pages 560-567

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.07.044

Keywords

Organophosphorus pesticides; Mesoporous silica; Solid-phase extraction; Gas chromatography; Water samples; Preconcentration

Funding

  1. MINECO of Spain
  2. FEDER [MAT2015-64139-C4-2-R]
  3. Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEO/2016/145]
  4. MEC [FPU16/02358]
  5. Universitat de Valencia [INV_PREDOC17F1-540310]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel sorbent based on a UVM-7 mesoporous silica doped with Ti has been synthesized and used for solid phase extraction of several organophosphorus pesticides in environmental water samples followed by gas chromatography coupled to a nitrogen-phosphorus selective detector. Thus, mesoporous silica materials doped with Ti and Fe as well as immobilized cyclodextrin silica-based supports were prepared and morphologically characterized by several techniques such as transmission electronic microscopy, nitrogen adsorption-desorption and X-ray diffraction. These sorbents were comparatively evaluated, and Ti25-UVM-7 material was selected as the best solid phase. After optimization of extraction parameters such as amount of solid-phase, type and volume of eluent, pH and ionic strength and breakthrough volume, recoveries between 81% and 104.5% were achieved, with RSD values below 7.8% and 12% for infra-day and inter-day repeatability respectively. Moreover, limits of quantification in the range 0.5-4.4 mu g L-1 were achieved for all target compounds using mass spectrometry detector. In addition, the developed method was applied for analysis of real water samples and it was validated with commercial C18 cartridges. Matrix effect was demonstrated in complex environmental matrices and the good reusability of synthesized material was also proved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available