4.7 Article

Engaging stakeholders in research to address water-energy-food (WEF) nexus challenges

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 1415-1426

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s11625-018-0552-7

Keywords

Water; Energy; Nexus; Transdisciplinary; Mixed-method

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/N00583X/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/N00583X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. ESRC [ES/M010163/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The water-energy-food (WEF) nexus has become a popular, and potentially powerful, frame through which to analyse interactions and interdependencies between these three systems. Though the case for transdisciplinary research in this space has been made, the extent of stakeholder engagement in research remains limited with stakeholders most commonly incorporated in research as end-users. Yet, stakeholders interact with nexus issues in a variety of ways, consequently there is much that collaboration might offer to develop nexus research and enhance its application. This paper outlines four aspects of nexus research and considers the value and potential challenges for transdisciplinary research in each. We focus on assessing and visualising nexus systems; understanding governance and capacity building; the importance of scale; and the implications of future change. The paper then proceeds to describe a novel mixed-method study that deeply integrates stakeholder knowledge with insights from multiple disciplines. We argue that mixed-method research designsin this case orientated around a number of cases studiesare best suited to understanding and addressing real-world nexus challenges, with their inevitable complex, non-linear system characteristics. Moreover, integrating multiple forms of knowledge in the manner described in this paper enables research to assess the potential for, and processes of, scaling-up innovations in the nexus space, to contribute insights to policy and decision making.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available