4.6 Article

Short-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a randomized controlled trial

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6350-6

Keywords

Short-term outcomes; Single-incision plus one-port; Laparoscopic surgery; Rectosigmoid cancer; Randomized controlled trial

Categories

Funding

  1. Major Program of Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [201508020047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveThe objective of the study is to evaluate the short-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port surgery (SILS+1) compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for colonic cancer.BackgroundAt present, single-incision laparoscopic colectomy remains technically challenging. The use of SILS+1 as an alternative has gained increasing attention; however, its safety and efficacy remain controversial.Methods and patientsBetween April 2014 and July 2016, 198 patients with clinical stage T1-4aN0-2 M0 rectosigmoid cancer were enrolled. The participants were randomly assigned to either SILS+1 (n=99) or CLS (n=99). The morbidity and mortality within 30days, operative and pathologic outcomes, postoperative recovery course, inflammation and immune responses, and pain intensity were compared.ResultsThere was no significant difference in overall complications between the two groups (17.2 vs. 16.3%, P=1.000). The total operating time for the SILS+1 group was significantly shorter (100.830.4 vs. 116.6 +/- 36.6, P=0.002). Blood loss was significantly greater in the CLS group (20 vs. 50, P<0.001). Thirteen patients (14%) in the CLS group required additional postoperative analgesics, which was significantly more than four patients in the SILS+1 group. Notably, on postoperative day three, the visual analogue scale score of the CLS group was greater than that of the SILS+1 group (1.3 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.7 +/- 1.3, P=0.023). Tumor diameter, pathologic stage, length of the proximal and distal margins, and number of lymph nodes harvested were similar, other values were also similar between the two groups.Conclusion Our findings suggest that SILS+1 might be safe and feasible for rectosigmoid cancer when performed by experienced surgeons. It offers minimal invasiveness without compromising oncologic treatment principles. Trial Registration This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02117557).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available