4.7 Article

Combined influences of tool shape and as-deposited diamond film on cutting performance of drills for CFRP machining

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 347, Issue -, Pages 390-397

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.05.024

Keywords

Tool shape; Diamond film; CFRP; Drilling force; Tool lifetime; Hole quality

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775339, 51705320]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016T90370, 15Z102060056]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When drilling the carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP), the tool shape and surface coating both play important roles in the cutting performance, which are complex and comprehensive, and should be systematically studied. In this research, WC-6wt.%Co drills in typical shapes are prepared, on which high-performance composite diamond films are deposited by the hot filament chemical vapor deposition (HFCVD) method. It is firstly proved by drilling tests that the tool shape always acts as a determining factor that significantly influences the drilling force and machining quality, for either the uncoated or diamond coated drills. The shorter chisel edge, smaller actual point angle and the proper double point angles are all factors in their favor. By contrast, as-deposited diamond films can slightly reduce the drilling force, while sometimes it even deteriorates the hole quality, due to the edge roundness caused by the alkali-acid pretreatment and the film growth. However, the diamond films play critical roles in improving the wear resistance, elongating the lifetime and guaranteeing the stability of the machining quality in the long-duration drilling process. In addition, the tool lifetime is also closely associated with the tool shape, attributed to the different thrust forces, consequently the lifetime of the diamond coated standard twist drill is much shorter than those of all other coated ones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available