4.5 Article

Metal-as-insulation variant of no-insulation HTS winding technique: pancake tests under high background magnetic field and high current at 4.2K

Journal

SUPERCONDUCTOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6668/aab4ec

Keywords

REBCO coil; no-insulation coil; metal-as-insulation coil; HTS insert; quench protection; magnet interaction; NI coil

Funding

  1. LNCMI-CNRS
  2. French National Research Agency (ANR) [ANR-14-CE05-0005]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-14-CE05-0005] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the framework of a project aiming at fabricating a 10 T high temperature superconducting (HTS) insert to operate in a 20 T background field, we are investigating the behavior of pancakes consisting of a REBCO HTS tape co-wound with a stainless steel tape (metal-as-insulation (MI) coil). The MI winding is inducing a significant turn-to-turn electrical resistance which helps to reduce the charging time delay. Despite this resistance, the self-protection feature of no-insulation coils is still enabled, thanks to the voltage limit of the power supply. We have built a single pancake coil representative of the pancake that will be used in the insert and performed tests under very high background magnetic field. Our coil experienced over 100 heater induced quenches without a measureable increase of its internal resistance. We have gathered stability and quench behavior data for magnetic fields and engineering current densities (j(e)) in the range of 0-17 T and 0-635 A mm(-2) respectively. We also present our very first experiments on the insert/outsert interaction in the case of a resistive magnet fault. We show that if self-protection of the MI winding is really effective in the case of a MI coil quench, a major issue comes from the outsert fault which induces a huge current inside the MI coil.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available