4.3 Article

Pregnancy Ambivalence and Contraceptive Use Among Young Adults in the United States

Journal

PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 236-243

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1363/4423612

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [T32 HD049339] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CONTEXT: Pregnancy ambivalence, or conflicted desire about having a baby, has been associated with decreased contraceptive use and unintended pregnancy. However, prior studies have neither included men nor focused on young adults, even though people in their 20s have the highest rates of unintended pregnancy. METHODS: Nationally representative data from 2008-2009 were used to examine pregnancy ambivalence and its association with contraceptive practices among 774 respondents who were 18-29 years old and in current sexual relationships. Bivariate and multivariate analyses assessed relationships between pregnancy ambivalence, contraceptive use, gender and other social, demographic and psychosocial variables. RESULTS: Forty-five percent of respondents exhibited pregnancy ambivalence. The proportion was higher among men than among women (53% vs. 36%), and the difference remained significant in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 2.9). Ambivalence was associated with lowered likelihood of contraceptive use, but this relationship was statistically significant only for men: Compared with men with clear intentions to avoid pregnancy, ambivalent men were less likely to have used any method of contraception in the last month (0.4). CONCLUSIONS: The association between men's pregnancy ambivalence and contraceptive practices suggests that women should not remain the sole targets of pregnancy prevention programs. Further research should explore whether clinical interventions that assess and address pregnancy ambivalence for both women and men could lead to improved contraceptive counseling and use. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2012, 44(4): 236-243, doi:10.1363/4423612

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available