4.1 Article

Drinking Patterns of College- and Non-College-Attending Young Adults: Is High-Intensity Drinking Only a College Phenomenon?

Journal

SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE
Volume 53, Issue 13, Pages 2157-2164

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1461224

Keywords

Young adults; latent class analysis; college; non-college; drinking patterns; high-intensity drinking

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA039854, P50DA039838] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA039854, P50 DA039838] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Young adults report the heaviest drinking of any age group, and many are at risk for experiencing an alcohol use disorder. Most research investigating young adult drinking has focused on single indicators of use. Using multiple dimensions of consumption, such as federal guidelines for daily/weekly drinking and engagement in drinking at twice the binge threshold (high-intensity drinking) to characterize drinking behavior could illuminate drinking patterns linked with harms. Objectives: We used a person-centered approach to examine latent classes of drinkers from a national sample of young adults. Further, we compared classes on college status. Methods: We used 2012-2013 data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC)-III. We included past-year drinkers aged 18-22years (n = 2213). Latent classes were estimated based on drinking frequency, daily/weekly drinking, frequency of heavy episodic drinking (4+/5+ drinks for women/men), frequency of high-intensity drinking (8+/10+ drinks), and intoxication frequency. Results: Five latent classes were identified: Occasional, Light Drinkers (30%), Regular Drinkers (6%), Infrequent Drinkers with Occasional Binging (10%), Frequent Drinkers with Occasional Binging (22%), and High-Intensity Drinkers (32%). Although membership in the two riskiest classes were more common among college-attenders, odds of being a High-Intensity Drinker relative to the second riskiest class was not significantly different for college- and non-college-attending young adults. Conclusions/Importance: As high-intensity drinking does not appear to be a drinking pattern unique to college-attenders and non-college-attenders are less likely to mature out of heavy drinking patterns, intervention efforts are needed for this at-risk age group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available