Long-term outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with spinal stenosis and degenerative scoliosis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Patients with spinal deformity may present with complaints related to either the deformity itself or the manifestations of the coexisting spinal stenosis. There are reports of successful management of lumbar pathology in the absence of global sagittal or coronal imbalance, with limited decompression and fusion, addressing only the symptomatic segment. PURPOSE: Our study examined the long-term outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). a less extensive procedure, based on the experience of the senior author over the past 10 years. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This was a retrospective study of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and spinal deformity managed by one surgeon at The Cleveland Clinic since 2003. PATIENT SAMPLE: Forty-one patients were included in the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The present study measures the long-term clinical functional outcomes of these patients through EQ-5D (EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire), PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire), and PDQ (Pain Disability Questionnaire) forms, along with documented radiographic parameters and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). METHODS: There were no funding or potential conflicts of interest associated biases in the present study. Patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis with neutral global alignment in the sagittal and coronal planes and symptomatic stenosis at the deformity level were treated by limited fusion and TLIF, and had a follow-up period of at least 5 years. Excluded were patients under 18 years of age, had more than three levels of fusion, and had an active spinal malignancy or recent spinal trauma. The grouping variables were curve magnitude, revision surgeries, and TLIF levels. Clinical outcomes were compared in all the grouping variables. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests were utilized; p<.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The average age and follow-up period were 66 +/- 10 and 7.5 years, respectively. There was no statistical difference between patients with curves measuring between 10 degrees and 20 degrees and greater than 20 degrees for EQ-5D. PHQ-9, and PDQ. Patients had worse PDQ data with larger curves compared with smaller curves at both 5 years and final follow-up. Although there was no statistical significance between preoperative coronal curve magnitude and revision surgeries, patients with curves greater than 20 degrees had higher rates of revision surgeries (75%; p=.343) in the global lumbar curve deformity group. Although there was no statistical significance for patients who underwent revision surgeries, those patients had low PHQ-9 values at the final follow-up (p=.09). The revision surgery rate was 48% in one-level TLIF and 18% in two-level TLIF. Moderate pain disability scores were noticed for one-level TLIF patients (mean=75) compared with two-level TLIF patients (mean=27) at the final follow-up, and approached statistical significance in this comparison (p=.06). CONCLUSION: Although this topic has a limited audience to spinal deformity surgeons. the prevalence of patients who present with adult spinal deformities has been increasing. Short segment fusion, in the setting of modest spinal deformity, is a reasonable and safe option. Further study on the concept of short segment fusions in the growing patient population is required as more comprehensive fusions do have noted complication rates, and a compromise must be reached between the extent of surgery that is enough to provide pain relief and disability and the degree of surgery that is too much to be tolerated in terms of complication rates. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.