4.5 Article

Minimum Clinically Important Difference in SF-36 Scores for Use in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Journal

SPINE
Volume 43, Issue 21, Pages E1260-E1266

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002684

Keywords

cervical spine; cervical spondylotic myelopathy; degenerative cervical myelopathy; minimum clinically important difference; psychometric properties; quality of life short form-36

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study Design. Post-hoc analysis of 606 patients enrolled in the AOSpine CSM-NA or CSM-I prospective, multicenter cohort studies. Objective. The aim of this study was to determine the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in SF-36v2 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Summary of Background Data. There has been a shift toward focus on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in spine surgery. However, the numerical scores of PROs lack immediate clinical meaning. The MCID adds a dimension of interpretability to PRO scales; by defining the smallest change, a patient would consider meaningful. Methods. The MCID of the SF-36v2 PCS and MCS were determined by distribution-and anchor-based methods comparing preoperative to 12-month scores. Distribution-based approaches included calculation of the half standard deviation and standard error of measurement (SEM). Change in Neck Disability Index (NDI) served as the anchor: worse'' (Delta NDI> 7.5); unchanged'' (7.5 >=Delta DNDI> 7.5); slightly improved'' (-7.5 >=Delta NDI>-15); and markedly improved'' (Delta NDI <=-15). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the change score for the MCID with even sensitivity and specificity to distinguish patients who were slightly improved'' versus unchanged'' on the NDI. Results. The MCID for the SF-36v2 PCS and MCS were 4.6 and 6.8 by half standard deviation and 2.9 and 4.3 by SEM, respectively. By ROC analysis, the MCID was 3.9 for the SF-36v2 PCS score and 3.2 for the SF-36v2 MCS score. Using a cutoff of 4 points, the SF-36v2 PCS had a sensitivity of 72.2% and specificity of 68.1%, and MCS 61.9% and 64.6%, respectively, in separating patients who were markedly improved'' or slightly improved'' from those who were unchanged'' or worse.'' Conclusion. We found the MCID of the SF-36v2 PCS and MCS to be 4 points. This will facilitate use of the SF-36v2 as an outcome in future studies of DCM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available