4.4 Article

Evaluating the Training of Filipino American Community Health Advisors to Disseminate Colorectal Cancer Screening

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages 1218-1225

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10900-012-9557-9

Keywords

Lay health educator; Community health educator; Evaluation of training; Self-efficacy; Knowledge; Satisfaction

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA016042, P30 CA16042, P30 CA016042-31] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Community health advisor-led interventions are associated with improved health promotion behaviors, such as cancer screening, but the process of training community health advisors is rarely described and evaluated. We trained 91 Filipino Americans from 19 organizations to conduct small-group sessions with members of their organizations to promote colorectal cancer screening. Community health advisors completed brief pre- and post-training surveys that included knowledge of colorectal cancer screening guidelines (four items), perceived self-efficacy of performing specific tasks (15-item scale, Cronbach's alpha > 0.90) and satisfaction with the training itself (five items). Community health advisors had high levels of knowledge and self-efficacy at pre-training, but levels increased significantly immediately after the 6-h training (percent of knowledge items answered correctly: 63-94 %; self-efficacy: 8.2-8.9 on a 10 point scale, both p < 0.001). Correlates of self-efficacy at pre- and post-test were high educational attainment, health care background, high level of participation in the organization, being perceived by others as a leader, and frequent participation in research activities in the past. Consistent evaluation measuring similar constructs across studies may help to standardize the quality of the training, and may improve the implementation of community health advisor-led programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available