4.7 Article

Indirect glyphosate detection based on ninhydrin reaction and surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2018.01.014

Keywords

Glyphoate; SERS; Ninhydrin; Pesticide; Detection

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of People's Republic of China of People's Republic of China [21773080, 21711540292, 31401486]
  2. Open Research Fund of National Research Center of Engineering and Technology of Tea Quality and Safety [2017NTQS0201]
  3. Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System [CARS-04]
  4. Open Fund Programme of Key Laboratory for Integrated Pest Management of Crop Pests in Northeastern China [DB201505KF03]
  5. Initial Scientific Research Fund of Jilin Agricultural University [2015010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glyphosate is one of the most commonly-used and non-selective herbicides in agriculture, which may directly pollute the environment and threaten human health. A simple and effective approach to assessment of its damage to the natural environment is thus quite necessary. However, traditional chromatography-based detection methods usually suffer from complex pretreatment procedures. Herein, we propose a simple and sensitive method for the determination of glyphosate by combining ninhydrin reaction and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectroscopy. The product (purple color dye, PD) of the ninhydrin reaction is found to SERS-active and directly correlate with the glyphosate concentration. The limit of detection of the proposed method for glyphosate is as low as 1.43 x 10(-8) mol.L-1 with a relatively wider linear concentration range (1.0 x 10(-7)-1.0 x 10(-4) mol.L-1), which demonstrates its great potential in rapid, highly sensitive concentration determination of glyphosate in practical applications for safety assessment of food and environment. 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available