4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Enhanced Oil Recovery in Liquid-Rich Shale Reservoirs: Laboratory to Field

Journal

SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 137-159

Publisher

SOC PETROLEUM ENG
DOI: 10.2118/175034-PA

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Marathon Oil Company
  2. Marathon Center of Excellence for Reservoir Studies (MCERS), Unconventional Natural Gas and Oil Institute at Colorado School of Mines
  3. EERC
  4. US Department of Energy [DE-FC26-08NT43291]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Production of tight oil from shale reservoirs in North America reduces oil imports and has better economics than natural gas. Currently, there is a strong interest in oil production from Bakken, Eagle Ford, Niobrara, and other tight formations. However, oil-recovery fraction l'or Bakken remains low, which is approximately 4 6% of the oil in place. Even with this low oil-recovery fraction, a recent United States Geological Survey study stated that the Bakken and Three Forks recoverable reserves are estimated to be 7.4 billion bbl; thus, a large volume of oil will remain unrecovered, which was the motivation to investigate the feasibility of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in liquid-rich shale reservoirs such as Bakken. In this paper, we will present both laboratory and numerical modeling of EOR in Bakken cores by use of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane/ethane-solvent mixture (C-2/C-2), and nitrogen (N-2). The laboratory experiments were conducted at the Energy and Environmental Research Center (EERC). The experiments recovered 90 % oil from several Middle Bakken cores and nearly 40% from Lower Bakken cores. To decipher the oil-recovery mechanisms in the experiments, a numerical compositional model was constructed to match laboratory-oil-recovery results. We concluded that solvent injection mobilizes matrix oil by miscible mixing and solvent extraction in a nanow region near the fracture/matrix interface, thus promoting countercurrent flow of oil from the matrix instead of oil displacement through the matrix. Specifically, compositional-modeling results indicate that the main oil-recovery mechanism is miscible oil extraction at the matrix/fracture interface region. However, the controlling factors include repressurization, oil swelling, viscosity and interfacial-tension (IFT) reduction, diffusion/advection mass transfer, and wettability alteration. We scaled up laboratory results to field applications by means of a compositional numerical model. For field applications, we resorted to the huff 'n' puff protocol to assess the EOR potential for a North Dakota Middle Bakken well. We concluded that long soak times yield only a small amount of additional oil compared with short soak times, and reinjecting wet gas, composed of C-1, C-2, C-3, and C4+, produces nearly as much oil as CO2 injection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available