4.5 Article

Molecular Mechanisms of Chloroquine Inhibition of Heterologously Expressed Kir6.2/SUR2A Channels

Journal

MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 82, Issue 5, Pages 803-813

Publisher

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/mol.112.079152

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01 HL45742]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia-Secretaria de Educacion Publica (Mexico) [CB-2008-01-105941]
  3. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
  4. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chloroquine and related compounds can inhibit inwardly rectifying potassium channels by multiple potential mechanisms, including pore block and allosteric effects on channel gating. Motivated by reports that chloroquine inhibition of cardiac ATP-sensitive inward rectifier K+ current (I-KATP) is antifibrillatory in rabbit ventricle, we investigated the mechanism of chloroquine inhibition of ATP-sensitive potassium (K-ATP) channels (Kir6.2/SUR2A) expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, using inside-out patch-clamp recordings. We found that chloroquine inhibits the Kir6.2/SUR2A channel by interacting with at least two different sites and by two mechanisms of action. A fast-onset effect is observed at depolarized membrane voltages and enhanced by the N160D mutation in the central cavity, probably reflecting direct channel block resulting from the drug entering the channel pore from the cytoplasmic side. Conversely, a slow-onset, voltage-independent inhibition of I-KATP is regulated by chloroquine interaction with a different site and probably involves disruption of interactions between Kir6.2/SUR2A and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. Our findings reveal multiple mechanisms of K-ATP channel inhibition by chloroquine, highlighting the numerous convergent regulatory mechanisms of these ligand-dependent ion channels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available