4.0 Article

Radiation from a Superbolide

Journal

SOLAR SYSTEM RESEARCH
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages 195-205

Publisher

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1134/S0038094618020065

Keywords

bolide; shock wave; ablation; meteor explosion; radiation; numerical simulation

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [16-17-00107]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Numerical simulation of the destruction, evaporation, deceleration, and emission of the Chelyabinsk superbolide has been carried out. The model assumes that the main energy is radiated in the stage when the asteroid is already completely destroyed and does not have solidity (quasi-liquid approximation). The radiation transfer during the motion is taken into account in the approximation of radiative heat conductivity and volumetric emission. The distributions of temperatures and densities are obtained at the moments when the bolide is at different altitudes. The intensity of radiation at the Earth's surface is calculated at certain times by solving the radiative transfer equation along the rays passing through the luminous region using the air and LL-chondrite vapor absorption coefficients. The features of superbolide radiation, the contribution of air and vapor to radiation, the size of the luminous region, and the radiation spectrum have been considered. The calculated efficiency of radiation-17% of the kinetic energy of a cosmic body-agrees with the results of observations. It is shown that due to anisotropy of the superbolide radiation, the determination of luminous efficiency from measurements can depend on the observation point. For estimations, the pointsource approximation can be used, but in general, the source luminous efficiency is unknown, and its location is determined with some error; therefore, numerical simulation is required to reliably estimate the consequences of space body falls.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available