4.2 Article

Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors among healthcare staff in a large healthcare institution in Singapore

Journal

SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 53, Issue 8, Pages 517-521

Publisher

SINGAPORE MEDICAL ASSOC

Keywords

cardiovascular disease; epidemiology; health personnel; mass screening; risk factors

Funding

  1. National Medical Research Council [NMRC/EDG/0008/2007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

INTRODUCTION This study aimed to determine the prevalence of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors among health workers (HWs) and non-health workers (NHWs) in a large hospital in Singapore. METHODS A cross-sectional prevalence survey of 3,384 hospital staff was conducted. The study comprised a self-administered questionnaire, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements, and laboratory analysis of fasting blood samples of total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and plasma glucose. HWs were doctors and nurses, while NHWs were health administrators, facility staff, clerks and administrative personnel. RESULTS A total of 3,384 out of 3,987 eligible staff (response rate 84.9%) participated in the survey. The majority of the participants were female (81%, n = 2,755), and 64% (n = 2,179) were 20-39 years old. HWs comprised almost two-thirds of the staff employed (61.3%, n = 2076), of whom 87.7% were female, while 72.5% of NHWs were female. Compared to HWs, NHWs had a higher adjusted (age, ethnic group and gender) prevalence of personal history of diabetes mellitus (adjusted prevalence rate ratio [PRR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [Cl] 1.02-2.64), cigarette smoking (adjusted PRR 1.85, 95% Cl 1.48-2.32), obesity (adjusted PRR 1.36, 95% Cl 1.05-1.75) and elevated systolic pressure (adjusted PRR 1.74, 95% Cl 1.31-2.31). CONCLUSION The prevalence of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in NHWs is higher than that in HWs. Health promotion programmes should address this captive and neglected audience in healthcare organisations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available