4.7 Article

CuSbSe2 thin film solar cells with similar to 4% conversion efficiency grown by low-temperature pulsed electron deposition

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS
Volume 185, Issue -, Pages 86-96

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.05.024

Keywords

CuSbSe2; Pulsed electron deposition; Earth abundant materials; Antimony; Chalcostibite; Thin-film solar cells

Funding

  1. HomePVPower project, within the Programma Operarivo Regionale FESR Emilia-Romagna [PG/2015/854382]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CuSb(S,Se)(2) is emerging as an alternative absorber for thin film photovoltaics, for its intrinsic p-type conductivity, tunable energy bandgap (1.0 divided by 1.6 eV), high absorption coefficient > 10(4) cm(-1) and very low cost of the constituent elements. In this work, we studied the structural, compositional and electro-optical properties of CuSbSe2 (CASe) films grown by Low Temperature Pulsed Electron Deposition (LTPED), a developing technology in thin film photovoltaics. We proved that stoichiometric or Cu-poor CASe films can be obtained at low temperature ( < 200 C) from a stoichiometric target with no need for post-deposition treatments to adjust the stoichiometry. Solar cells based on Cu-poor and stoichiometric CASe absorbers exhibit a similar open circuit voltage (290 310 mV), while the Jsc increases from similar to 3 mA/cm(2) up to- 20 mA/cm(2) as the Cu/Sb ratio increases from 0.55 to 0.95. A low FF-40% still limits the performance of all the cells indicating that the standard architecture of thin film solar cells, currently used for CIGS and CdTe devices, need to be significantly reviewed. The results of the structural and optoelectrical characterization presented in this paper show that Jsc, Voc and FF can all be improved as a result of the optimization of the device architecture. The best of the LTPED-grown CASe cells obtained so far, reached an efficiency of 3.8%, very close to the state of the art reported so far in literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available