4.6 Article

Deep-level transient spectroscopy characterization of electrical traps in p-type multicrystalline silicon with gettering and hydrogenation process

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY
Volume 162, Issue -, Pages 372-377

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.01.027

Keywords

Multicrystalline silicon; Electrical traps; Phosphorus gettering; Hydrogenation

Categories

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2015AA050302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In p-type multicrystalline silicon solar cells, defects in silicon bulk are well known to act as carrier recombination centers and considerably affect the conversion efficiency of cells. In this study, effective minority carrier lifetime (tau(eff)) mapping and deep-level transient spectroscopy (DLTS) data were utilized to evaluate gettering efficiency and hydrogenation passivation in bulk defects. Microwave photoconductivity decay method was used to illustrate the effect of phosphorus gettering behavior and hydrogenation process on the bulk carrier lifetime of multicrystalline silicon. Results showed that tau(eff) drastically improved after gettering and further increased after hydrogenation. DLTS results further revealed six traps corresponding to interstitial iron (Fe-i), Fe-O complex, FeB complex, vanadium, Fe-i complex and divacancy oxygen. The main trap in a nongettered sample was related to Fei, with two deep levels at about E-v + 0.373 and E-v + 0.470 eV. However, the Fe-i complex was the main trap in the gettered sample, with two deep traps at about E-v + 0.390 and E-v + 0.442 eV. Finally, we concluded that Fe-i defect and FeB complex can be significantly removed by phosphorus diffusion gettering. Moreover, divacancy-oxygen complexes, vanadium and Fe-O defects were effectively passivated by hydrogenation process. Fe-i complex, however, was hardly removed by these two process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available