Journal
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages 37-48Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1433-0
Keywords
Human resources; Recognition; Dignity; Frankfurt School; Critical theory; Reification
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article examines the ethical framing of employment in contemporary human resource management (HRM). Using Axel Honneth's theory of recognition and classical critical notions of reification, I contrast recognition and reifying stances on labor. The recognition approach embeds work in its emotive and social particularity, positively affirming the basic dignity of social actors. Reifying views, by contrast, exhibit a forgetfulness of recognition, removing action from its existential and social moorings, and imagining workers as bundles of discrete resources or capacities. After discussing why reification is a problem, I stress that recognition and reification embody different ethical standpoints with regards to organizational practices. Thus, I argue paradoxically that many current HRM best practices can be maintained while cultivating an attitude of recognition. If reification is a type of forgetting, cultivating a recognition attitude involves processes of remembering to foster work relations that reinforce employee dignity.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available