4.6 Article

Fractal dimension based damage identification incorporating multi-task sparse Bayesian learning

Journal

SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-665X/aac248

Keywords

damage identification; fractal dimension; multi-task learning; sparse Bayesian learning

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1500605]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778192, 51638007, 51308161]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sensitivity to damage and robustness to noise are critical requirements for the effectiveness of structural damage detection. In this study, a two-stage damage identification method based on the fractal dimension analysis and multi-task Bayesian learning is presented. The Higuchi's fractal dimension (HFD) based damage index is first proposed, directly examining the time-frequency characteristic of local free vibration data of structures based on the irregularity sensitivity and noise robustness analysis of HFD. Katz's fractal dimension is then presented to analyze the abrupt irregularity change of the spatial curve of the displacement mode shape along the structure. At the second stage, the multi-task sparse Bayesian learning technique is employed to infer the final damage localization vector, which borrow the dependent strength of the two fractal dimension based damage indication information and also incorporate the prior knowledge that structural damage occurs at a limited number of locations in a structure in the absence of its collapse. To validate the capability of the proposed method, a steel beam and a bridge, named Yonghe Bridge, are analyzed as illustrative examples. The damage identification results demonstrate that the proposed method is capable of localizing single and multiple damages regardless of its severity, and show superior robustness under heavy noise as well.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available