4.3 Article

The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same? Prior Achievement Fails to Explain Gender Inequality in Entry Into STEM College Majors Over Time

Journal

AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages 1048-1073

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.3102/0002831211435229

Keywords

achievement; gender; math; postsecondary; science

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R24 HD042849] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Division Of Undergraduate Education
  3. Direct For Education and Human Resources [0757018] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates the empirical basis for often-repeated arguments that gender differences in entrance into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors are largely explained by disparities in prior achievement. Analyses use data from three national cohorts of college matriculates across three decades to consider differences across several indicators of high school math and science achievement at the mean and also at the top of the test distribution. Analyses also examine the different comparative advantages men and women enjoy in math/science versus English/reading. Regardless of how prior achievement is measured, very little of the strong and persistent gender gap in physical science and engineering majors over time is explained. Findings highlight the limitations of theories focusing on gender differences in skills and suggest directions for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available