4.7 Article

Performance evaluation of novel nanostructured modified mesoporous silica/polyetherimide composite membranes for the treatment of oil/water emulsion

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 205, Issue -, Pages 32-47

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.05.007

Keywords

Composite membranes; Mesoporous silica; Hydrophilicity; Oil-water emulsion; Bacterial anti-adhesion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The discharges from industries particularly petroleum industry at any stage from exploration/drilling to transportation are of major environmental concerns in the present scenario. In this work, mesoporous silica (SBA-15) was modified using a bio-inspired coating and was used as filler in the fabrication of efficient, robust polyetherimide composite ultrafiltration membranes. The membranes prepared by this facile two-step approach were seen to be highly hydrophilic with improved porosity and pore-interconnectivity with a thinner skin layer. The rougher top surfaces of these membranes imparted an oleophobic character under water. The composite membranes exhibited improved emulsion/water flux while maintaining > 99.8% rejection of oil from a synthetic motor oil/water/surfactant emulsion. The composite membranes were investigated for its long-term efficiency in the removal of oil from produced water. The flux declination was only < 15% for up to 9 h with three intermittent backwashes and the oil/grease content of the permeate was lower than 10 ppm, well below the discharge limits. A significant improvement in antimicrobial characteristic was found to be achieved by the composite membranes against the gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis) and gram-negative (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) bacteria. The results from this study indicate that the polydopamine decorated SBA-15in-corporatedpolyetherimide membranes hold a promising potential to be employed for oil-water emulsion separation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available