4.7 Article

Ultrasensitive binder-free glucose sensors based on the pyrolysis of in situ grown Cu MOF

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 254, Issue -, Pages 272-281

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.07.024

Keywords

Metal organic frameworks; Electrodeposition; Pyrolysis; Carbon metal composite materials; Glucose sensors; Ultrasensitive

Funding

  1. China Fund KU Leuven [ISP/13/02SJT]
  2. Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO) [12F5514N]
  3. Technical University of Denmark [V410316N]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21673105]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [1zujbky-2016-k09]
  6. Generalitat de Catalunya [SGR 1638]
  7. Spanish MINECO coordinated projects
  8. ICN2 TNT-FUELS
  9. e-TNT [MAT2014-59961-C2-2-R]
  10. Severo Ochoa Program (MINECO) [SEV-2013-0295]
  11. CERCA Programme / Generalitat de Catalunya
  12. Minjiang Scholar Program and key project of Department of Education, Fujian Province, China [JZ160480]
  13. [1529816N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on carbon/Cu composite materials was developed by the in situ growth and subsequent pyrolysis of metal-organic frameworks (M0F5) on Cu foam. After pyrolysis, SEM, HRTEM and STEM-EELS were employed to clarify the hierarchical Cu@porous carbon electrode. It is found that the Cu nanoparticles are uniformly embedded in the carbon matrix, carbon matrix in close contact with the pyrolized carbon sheets. The electrocatalytic activity of the Cu@porous carbon matrix electrode for glucose sensing was explored by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and chronoamperometry. The resulting Cu@porous carbon matrix electrode displays ultrahigh sensitivity (10.1 mA cm(-2) mM(-1)), low detection limit (0.6 mu A), short response time (less than 2 s) and good stability, indicating that the developed electrode is a promising glucose sensor. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available