4.7 Article

Optimizing the sensitivity of palladium based hydrogen sensors

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 259, Issue -, Pages 10-19

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.11.180

Keywords

Hydrogen; Palladium; Gas detector; Fiber optic sensor; Strain transfer; Fiber bragg gratings

Funding

  1. New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) [RTVU1304]
  2. ETEL Limited (Auckland)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports on the sensitivity optimization of palladium based hydrogen sensors. The transduction mechanism is the volumetric expansion of palladium, leading to induced strain in a strain sensing element. Absorption of hydrogen in the palladium lattice causes expansion, which can be measured using strain sensors attached to the palladium. The strain transduced from the expanding palladium is dependent not only on the hydrogen partial pressure and temperature, but also the geometry of the palladium and the mechanical transfer of strain to the sensor. In this paper we demonstrate the design and validation of a sensor for defined hydrogen concentration ranges, selection of a working temperature, and selection of a palladium geometry to achieve a desired sensitivity. We show that operating temperature and concentration range are critical in order to avoid the phase change region, which can cause hysteresis, as well as degradation of the palladium itself and the adhesive interface. In order to quantify the strain transfer between palladium and the sensor, a coefficient of strain transfer k(st) is introduced. Two empirical methods are demonstrated to calculate kst: (a) via calibration for hydrogen sensitivity, (b) via calibration for temperature sensitivity. Three sensor designs, with fiber Bragg gratings as a strain sensor, are used to correlate the theoretical design assumptions with experimental data. (c) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available