4.6 Article

The early twentieth century warming and winter Arctic sea ice

Journal

CRYOSPHERE
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages 1231-1237

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/tc-6-1231-2012

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union's THOR project
  2. NATO Collaborative Linkage Grant [983725]
  3. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [11-05-00579, 12-05-00617]
  4. Programs of Russian Academy of Sciences [4, 31]
  5. Nordatlantik project of the German Ministry of Research (BMBF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Arctic has featured the strongest surface warming over the globe during the recent decades, and the temperature increase has been accompanied by a rapid decline in sea ice extent. However, little is known about Arctic sea ice change during the early twentieth century warming (ETCW) during 1920-1940, also a period of a strong surface warming, both globally and in the Arctic. Here, we investigate the sensitivity of Arctic winter surface air temperature (SAT) to sea ice during 1875-2008 by means of simulations with an atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) forced by estimates of the observed sea surface temperature (SST) and sea ice concentration. The Arctic warming trend since the 1960s is very well reproduced by the model. In contrast, ETCW in the Arctic is hardly captured. This is consistent with the fact that the sea ice extent in the forcing data does not strongly vary during ETCW. AGCM simulations with observed SST but fixed sea ice reveal a strong dependence of winter SAT on sea ice extent. In particular, the warming during the recent decades is strongly underestimated by the model, if the sea ice extent does not decline and varies only seasonally. This suggests that a significant reduction of winter Arctic sea ice extent may have also accompanied the early twentieth century warming, pointing toward an important link between anomalous sea ice extent and Arctic surface temperature variability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available