4.7 Article

Characteristics of PM2.5 from ship emissions and their impacts on the ambient air: A case study in Yangshan Harbor, Shanghai

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 640, Issue -, Pages 207-216

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.261

Keywords

Ship emissions; Air pollution; V; PMF; Shanghai port

Funding

  1. Natural Scientific Foundation of China [41603090, 41273135]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rapid development of ports in China over the last two decades has had inevitable consequences on the ambient air quality in coastal areas and harbors. For mitigation strategies and monitoring aims, the contributions of ship emissions should be identified, especially in these specific areas. Therefore, in this study, fine particulate matters (PM2.5) samples were collected at Yangshan Harbor in 2016 to characterize ship emissions and estimate their impacts on the ambient air. The results showed that the average annual PM2.5 concentration was 44.02 mu g/m(3) at Yangshan Harbor. The mean seasonal PM2.5 concentrations reached a maximum in the spring (60.28 mu g/m(3)) and a minimum in the summer (28.04 mu g/m(3)). Two methods were used in this study to estimate the contributions of ship emissions to the ambient air. When a V-based method was used, the primary estimated daily contributions of ship emissions to the ambient air at Yangshan Harbor ranged from 0.02 to 0.73 mu g/m(3) with an annual average of 0.10 mu g/m(3). When a PMF-based method was used, the contributions ranged from 0.02 to 9.15 mu g/m(3) with an annual average of 1.02 mu g/m(3). In fact, there was a significant underestimation of the true influences of ship emissions when only the primary contribution was considered. In accordance with this evidence, there was a main average underestimation of 1.84 mu g/m(3). (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available