Journal
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 637, Issue -, Pages 943-953Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.047
Keywords
Mercury; Wet deposition; Scavenging coefficient; Potential source contribution function
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Measurements of ambient speciated mercury (Hg) concentrations and Hg wet deposition were made at two urban sites (Bronx, NY and Rochester, NY) and one rural site (Potsdam, NY) in New York State in 2013 and 2014 to: 1) determine the factors influencing Hg wet deposition concentrations, 2) identify the contribution of gaseous oxidized Hg (GOM) and particulate bound Hg (PBM) scavenging to Hg wet deposition concentrations, and 3) identify potential source areas associated with high concentration events. The Bronx had the highest mean gaseous elemental Hg (GEM) and GOMconcentrations, Rochester had the highest mean PBMand the lowest GOM concentrations, and Potsdam had the lowest mean GEM and PBM concentrations. The annual volume weighted mean (VWM) Hg concentrations and Hg wet deposition fluxes in the Bronx, Rochester, and Potsdam were significantly different with mean values of 10.3 +/- 8.16, 10.2 +/- 9.06, and 5.07 +/- 1.79 ngL(-1) and 8.45 +/- 0.64, 6.65 +/- 0.21, and 5.25 +/- 0.49 mu g/m(2) year(-1), respectively. Hg wet deposition flux and precipitation depth were positively correlated at all three sites as were Hg concentration in precipitation and weekly GOM concentrations at the Bronx and Potsdam sites. Scavenging coefficients (SC) of 680, 630, 850 for GOM and 410, 320, and 410 for PBM at Bronx, Rochester, and Potsdam, respectively, suggest GOMis responsible for most of the scavenged Hg. Measured GOM and PBM concentrations were relatively constant before precipitation events and Hg concentrations in precipitation did not vary significantly during precipitation events implying the scavenging process mainly occurred in clouds. VWM Hg concentrations, monthly accumulated Hg flux, and SCs for GOM and PBM were higher at the urban sites and significantly different for non-snow and snow events. Local sources appeared more important at the rural site while regional sources affected high urban concentrations. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available