4.7 Article

Reducing mortality risk by targeting specific air pollution sources: Suva, Fiji

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 612, Issue -, Pages 450-461

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.225

Keywords

PM2.5 components; Health risk; Fossil fuel; Road vehicles; Black carbon

Funding

  1. Australian Government Research Training Program [MQRES13]
  2. Australian Government National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS)
  3. AINSE Ltd. [ALNGRA14537_11256, ALNGRA15531]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Health implications of air pollution vary dependent upon pollutant sources. This work determines the value, in terms of reduced mortality, of reducing ambient particulate matter (PM2.5: effective aerodynamic diameter 2.5 mu m or less) concentration due to different emission sources. Suva, a Pacific Island city with substantial input from combustion sources, is used as a case-study. Elemental concentration was determined, by ion beam analysis, for PM2.5 samples from Suva, spanning one year. Sources of PM2.5 have been quantified by positive matrix factorisation. A review of recent literature has been carried out to delineate the mortality risk associated with these sources. Risk factors have then been applied for Suva, to calculate the possible mortality reduction that may be achieved through reduction in pollutant levels. Higher risk ratios for black carbon and sulphur resulted in mortality predictions for PM2.5 from fossil fuel combustion, road vehicle emissions and waste burning that surpass predictions for these sources based on health risk of PM2.5 mass alone. Predicted mortality for Suva from fossil fuel smoke exceeds the national toll from road accidents in Fiji. The greatest benefit for Suva, in terms of reduced mortality, is likely to be accomplished by reducing emissions from fossil fuel combustion (diesel), vehicles and waste burning. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available