4.7 Article

Development of water quality criteria of ammonia for protecting aquatic life in freshwater using species sensitivity distribution method

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 634, Issue -, Pages 934-940

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.018

Keywords

Total ammonia nitrogen; Aquatic life; Ecological risk assessment; Water quality criteria; Species sensitivity distribution; HC5 value

Funding

  1. National Institute of Environment Research (NIER) - Ministry of Environment (MOE) of the Republic of Korea [NIER-2015-02-02-073]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ammonia is deemed one of the most important pollutants in the freshwater environment because of its highly toxic nature and ubiquity in surface water. This study thus aims to derive the criteria for ammonia in freshwater to protect aquatic life because there are no water quality criteria for ammonia in Korea. Short- term lethal tests were conducted to perform the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) method. Thismethod iswidely used in ecological risk assessment to determine the chemical concentrations to protect aquatic species. Based on the species sensitivity distributionmethod using Korean indigenous aquatic biota, the hazardous concentration for 5% of biological species (HC5) value calculated in this study was 44 mg/L as total ammonia nitrogen (TAN). The value of the assessment factor was set at 2. Consequently, the criteria for ammonia were derived as 22 mg/ L at pH 7 and 20 degrees C. When the derived value was applied to the monitoring data nationwide, 0.51%, 0.09%, 0.18%, 0.20%, and 0.35% of the monitoring sites in Han River, Nakdong River, Geum River, Youngsan River, and lakes throughout the nation, respectively, exceeded this criteria. TheMinistry of Environment in Korea has been considering introducing water quality standard of ammonia for protecting aquatic life. Therefore, our results can provide the basis for introducing the ammonia standard in Korea. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available