4.7 Article

Bioelectrochemically assisted anaerobic digestion system for biogas upgrading and enhanced methane production

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 633, Issue -, Pages 1012-1021

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.255

Keywords

One-chamber MEC; Methanobacterium; Water electrolysis; Hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis; Fermentation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of biofilm and external voltage on the performance and microbial community composition of batch-fed, combined anaerobic digestion-bioelectrochemical cell (AD-BEC) systems under different operational conditions. A dextrin/peptone mixture was fed at a range of organic loading rates (0.34 to 1.37 g COD/L-d). The hybrid system with both suspended biomass and biofilm without any external potential application achieved a substantially higher initial soluble COD consumption (53.7 +/- 2.3% vs. 39.7 +/- 3.7) and methane (CH4) production (331 vs. 225 mL) within one day of feeding than the conventional AD system (suspended biomass only). Compared to the conventional AD system, the hybrid systems had higher resilience to shock organic loadings. A range of external potential (0.5 to 2.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl) was applied to AD-BEC reactors, developed with two different start-up procedures. A potential of 2.0 V resulted in water electrolysis leading to a higher CH4 production rate (105 vs. 84 mL/L-d) and biogas CH4 content (88.5 +/- 1.4 vs. 64.5 +/- 1.9%) in the AD-BEC reactor (closed vs. open circuit condition, respectively). Application of external potential enriched putative exoelectrogens at the anode biofilm and hydrogenotrophic methanogens at the cathode biofilm, which may have contributed to the observed enhanced CH4 production in the AD-BEC system. A phylotype related to Methanobacterium formicicum, a hydrogenotrophic methanogen, dominated the archaeal community in the AD-BEC cathode biofilm. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available