4.7 Article

Inside the guts of the city: Urban-induced alterations of the gut microbiota in a wild passerine

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 612, Issue -, Pages 1276-1286

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.035

Keywords

Microbiome; Urbanisation; House sparrows; Global change; Anthropogenic perturbations; 16S Metabarcoding

Funding

  1. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme [P07/4]
  2. French Laboratory of Excellence [ANR-10-LABX-41:ANR-11-IDEX-0002-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urbanisation represents one of the most radical forms of terrestrial land use change and has been shown to lead to alterations in ecosystem functioning and community dynamics and changes in individual phenotypic traits. While the recent surge in microbiome studies has brought about a paradigm shift by which individuals cannot truly be considered independently of the bacterial communities they host, the role of gut microbiota in organismal response to human-induced environmental change is still scarcely studied. Here, we applied a metabarcoding approach to examine the impact of urbanisation on the gut microbiota of Passer domesticus. We found urbanisation to be associated to lower microbiota species diversity, modifications in taxonomic composition and community structure, and changes in functional composition. The strength of these relationships, however, depended on the spatial scale and season at which they were considered. Such spatio-temporal effect suggests that urbanisation may dampen the natural seasonal variation of the gut microbiota observed in more pristine habitats, potentially influencing the fitness of urban organisms. Our results hence shed light on a hitherto little considered perspective, i.e. that the negative effects of urbanisation on city-dwelling organisms may extend to their microbiomes, causing potential dysbioses. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available