4.1 Article

Effect of Indole-3-Butyric Acid on Root Formation in Alnus glutinosa Microcuttings

Journal

SILVA FENNICA
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 643-654

Publisher

FINNISH SOC FOREST SCIENCE-NATURAL RESOURCES INST FINLAND
DOI: 10.14214/sf.916

Keywords

alder; histology; mature trees; rooting

Categories

Funding

  1. INLUDES (Diputacion Provincial de Lugo)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

San Jose, M.C, Romero, L. & Janeiro, L.V. 2012. Effect of indole-3-butyric acid on root formation in Alnus glutinosa microcuttings. Silva Fennica 46(5): 643-654. A study of the in vitro rooting process in mature alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.) shoots is described. Microcuttings from shoots cultured in vitro were transferred to a half-strength Woody Plant Medium containing 0 or 0.1 mg 1(-1) indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) for 0 to 7 days. The presence of IBA in the medium increased the rooting percentage, number of roots, percentage of lateral roots, and length of the shoots. Histological studies were carried out with shoots treated with 0 or 0.1 mg l(-1)IBA for 7 days. According to these criteria, treatment with IBA for 2-3 days proved to be the most successful. In both treatments, substancial reactivation of cell division was observed at the base of the shoots after 1 day. Some cambial zone and adjacent phloem cells became dense cytoplasm, having nuclei with prominent nucleoli. The first cell divisions were also observed at this time. In the treatment with IBA (0.1 mg 1(-1) for 7 days), meristemoids became individualized, consisting of densely staining cells, by day 3. Identifiable conical shaped root primordia with several cell layers were visible after 4-5 days. Roots with an organized tissue system emerged from the stem after 6 days in the IBA-treated shoots. Meristemoid formation was delayed until the fourth day and root emergence until the eight day in the control treatment (no IBA).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available