Journal
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 1224-1238Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0196-y
Keywords
Longitudinal data; Linear mixed model; Kenward-Roger method; Robustness; Nonnormal distributions
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Using a Monte Carlo simulation and the Kenward-Roger (KR) correction for degrees of freedom, in this article we analyzed the application of the linearmixed model (LMM) to amixed repeated measures design. The LMM was first used to select the covariance structure with three types of data distribution: normal, exponential, and log-normal. This showed that, with homogeneous between-groups covariance and when the distribution was normal, the covariance structure with the best fit was the unstructured population matrix. However, with heterogeneous between-groups covariance and when the pairing between covariance matrices and group sizes was null, the best fit was shown by the between-subjects heterogeneous unstructured population matrix, which was the case for all of the distributions analyzed. By contrast, with positive or negative pairings, the within-subjects and between subjects heterogeneous first-order autoregressive structure produced the best fit. In the second stage of the study, the robustness of the LMM was tested. This showed that the KR method provided adequate control of Type I error rates for the time effect with normally distributed data. However, as skewness increased-as occurs, for example, in the log-normal distribution-the robustness of KR was null, especially when the assumption of sphericity was violated. As regards the influence of kurtosis, the analysis showed that the degree of robustness increased in line with the amount of kurtosis.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available