3.8 Proceedings Paper

Hybrid algorithms in quantum Monte Carlo

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/402/1/012008

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DOEDE- FG05-08OR23336]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [0904572]
  3. US DOE by LLNL [DEAC52- 07NA27344]
  4. Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program of Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  5. UT-Battelle, LLC
  6. U.S. Department of Energy
  7. U.S. DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-AC04-94AL85000]
  8. National Center for Computational Sciences and the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences
  9. Advanced Scienti fi c Computing Research and Basic Energy Sciences of DOE [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  10. NSF [TG-MCA93S030, TGMCA07S016]
  11. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC)
  12. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [0940889, 0904572] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With advances in algorithms and growing computing powers, quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods have become a leading contender for high accuracy calculations for the electronic structure of realistic systems. The performance gain on recent HPC systems is largely driven by increasing parallelism: the number of compute cores of a SMP and the number of SMPs have been going up, as the Top500 list at tests. However, the available memory as well as the communication and memory bandwidth per element has not kept pace with the increasing parallelism. This severely limits the applicability of QMC and the problem size it can handle. OpenMP/MPI hybrid programming provides applications with simple but effective solutions to overcome efficiency and scalability bottlenecks on large-scale clusters based on multi/many-core SMPs. We discuss the design and implementation of hybrid methods in QMCPACK and analyze its performance on current HPC platforms characterized by various memory and communication hierarchies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available