4.1 Article

Are general practitioners characteristics associated with the quality of type 2 diabetes care in general practice? Results from the Norwegian ROSA4 study from 2014

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 170-179

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1459238

Keywords

Type 2 diabetes; general practitioner; specialization; gender; quality of care; family medicine

Funding

  1. ExtraFoundation Health and Rehabilitation
  2. Norwegian Women's Public Health Association
  3. Extrastiftelsen
  4. Endocriology Research Foundation
  5. Norwegian Medical Association
  6. Norwegian Diabetes Association
  7. AstraZenica
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim
  9. Eli Lilly
  10. MSD
  11. Novo Nordisk
  12. Sanofi Aventis
  13. University of Oslo
  14. Endocrinology Research Foundation
  15. Stavanger
  16. Helse Nord

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To explore the associations between general practitioners (GPs) characteristics such as gender, specialist status, country of birth and country of graduation and the quality of care for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting and subjects: The 277 GPs provided care for 10082 patients with T2DM in Norway in 2014. The GPs characteristics were self-reported: 55% were male, 68% were specialists in General Practice, 82% born in Norway and 87% had graduated in Western Europe. Of patients, 81% were born in Norway and 8% in South Asia. Data regarding diabetes care were obtained from electronic medical records and manually verified. Main outcome measures: Performance of recommended screening procedures, prescribed medication and level of HbA1c, blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol stratified according to GPs characteristics, adjusted for patient and GP characteristics. Result: Female GPs, specialists, GPs born in Norway and GPs who graduated in Western Europe performed recommended procedures more frequently than their counterparts. Specialists achieved lower mean HbA1c (7.14% vs. 7.25%, p< 0.01), a larger proportion of their patients achieved good glycaemic control (HbA1c = 6.0%-7.0%) (49.1% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.018) and lower mean systolic blood pressure (133.0 mmHg vs. 134.7 mmHg, p < 0.01) compared with non-specialists. GPs who graduated in Western Europe achieved lower diastolic blood pressure than their counterparts (76.6 mmHg vs. 77.8 mmHg, p< 0.01). Conclusion: Several quality indicators for type 2 diabetes care were better if the GPs were specialists in General Practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available