4.5 Article

Challenges of ligand identification for the second wave of orphan riboswitch candidates

Journal

RNA BIOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 377-390

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2017.1403002

Keywords

Aptamer; comparative sequence analysis; gene regulation; metabolite; noncoding RNA; signaling molecule

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) [GM022778, DE022340]
  2. NIH [T32GM007223, F32GM116426]
  3. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program [IDGE1122492]
  4. HHMI Investigator support
  5. Division Of Physics
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1522467] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Orphan riboswitch candidates are noncoding RNA motifs whose representatives are believed to function as genetic regulatory elements, but whose target ligands have yet to be identified. The study of certain orphans, particularly classes that have resisted experimental validation for many years, has led to the discovery of important biological pathways and processes once their ligands were identified. Previously, we highlighted details for four of the most common and intriguing orphan riboswitch candidates. This facilitated the validation of riboswitches for the signaling molecules c-di-AMP, ZTP, and ppGpp, the metal ion Mn2+, and the metabolites guanidine and PRPP. Such studies also yield useful linkages between the ligands sensed by the riboswitches and numerous biochemical pathways. In the current report, we describe the known characteristics of 30 distinct classes of orphan riboswitch candidates - some of which have remained unsolved for over a decade. We also discuss the prospects for uncovering novel biological insights via focused studies on these RNAs. Lastly, we make recommendations for experimental objectives along the path to finding ligands for these mysterious RNAs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available